Garbage collection services · California

Elder Creek Transfer Station

Sacramento, CA · ~51 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Elder Creek Transfer Station runs at 359% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Garbage collection services workplace, earning a grade F.

Elder Creek Transfer Station: 9.3 TCR = 359% of Garbage collection services BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Elder Creek Transfer Station safety composite

Elder Creek Transfer Station scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2017→2023

Elder Creek Transfer Station injury rate improved

Elder Creek Transfer Station's TCR fell 6.7 from 13.7 in 2017 to 7.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 25.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.7 · 2019=25.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=7.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 359% of ind

  • DART 7.1 DART
  • RANK #164/247
  • PHOTO Central Missouri Tra…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Central Missouri Transfer (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Elder Creek Transfer Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Elder Creek Transfer Station averages 9.3 TCR (359% of the Garbage collection services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Elder Creek Transfer Station TCR series: 2017=13.7 · 2019=25.8 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=7.1 · BLS 2.6

Where Elder Creek Transfer Station falls in its industry

2,322 Garbage collection services establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #164 safest of 247 Garbage collection services employers in California.

Elder Creek Transfer Station (51 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Elder Creek Transfer Station
Elder Creek Transfer Station (51 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Elder Creek Transfer Station has fewer employees than the Garbage collection services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.1 7.1 18 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 25.8 17.2 3 0 0
2017 13.7 6.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · CA · Sacramento

2,322 Garbage collection services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Central Missouri Transfer 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Des Moines -IA 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oak Ridge Waste & Recycling of CT, LLC - Stamford 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waste Pro 613 - Baton Rouge 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert Young Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE H&W Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huber Farms Inc 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Brothers Farms Inc 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Spring Market #717 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Gheen Irrigation Airport 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Steelhead Composites Headquarters 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc. 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tiger Sioux Falls 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summer Breeze Operating, LLC 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Linc 0850 (Fort Wayne - F) 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madison Children's Museum 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.