Antimony oxide (except pigments) manufacturing · Massachusetts

Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc.

Ashland, MA · ~27 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc. runs at 283% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Antimony oxide (except pigments) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc.: 9.3 TCR = 283% of Antimony oxide (except pigments) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2017→2023

Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc. injury rate improved

Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc.'s TCR fell 6.7 from 16.8 in 2017 to 10.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=16.8 · 2018=14.3 · 2019=16.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=10.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325180 · Ashland, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 283% of ind

  • DART 10.1 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Hammond Lead Product…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hammond Lead Products - Pottstown Plant (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc. averages 9.3 TCR (283% of the Antimony oxide (except pigments) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2017=16.8 · 2018=14.3 · 2019=16 · 2020=0 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=10.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

418 Antimony oxide (except pigment establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Antimony oxide (except pigment employers in Massachusetts.

Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc. (27 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc.
Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc. (27 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Nyacol Nano Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Antimony oxide (except pigments) manufac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.1 10.1 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.2 8.2 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 16.0 4.0 4 0 0
2018 14.3 3.6 4 0 0
2017 16.8 6.7 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325180 · MA · Ashland

418 Antimony oxide (except pigments) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 21 employers in Ashland, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hammond Lead Products - Pottstown Plant 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colorado Salt Products, LLC 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Haven Chlor-Alkali LLC 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR APL Engineered Materials, Inc. 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE High Profile - Dorchester 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES Salem Harbor Station 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE NORTH ANDOVER-METHUEN-MA30 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE TEWKSBURY-MA47 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #46 321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kidde-Fenwal, Inc 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR USA-MA-Kidde Fenwal-Ashland Factory 251 FTE
CITY-NEAR Terumo Cardiovascular Group 181 FTE
NAT-TCR Inland Steel Erectors, Inc. 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Steelhead Composites Headquarters 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR PRU 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Elder Creek Transfer Station 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wiskerchen Truck & Equipment LLC 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE AZ-Tucson 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE O'Connor Distributing- Three Lakes Division 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Red Cross - 1415 Trumbull Ave 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.