Retirement communities, continuing care · Pennsylvania

Elderwood Senior Living of Lancaster

Lancaster, PA · ~26 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Elderwood Senior Living of Lancaster runs at 292% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Elderwood Senior Living of Lancaster: 11.1 TCR = 292% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Elderwood Senior Living of Lancaster safety composite

Elderwood Senior Living of Lancaster scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2019→2021

Elderwood Senior Living of Lancaster injury rate improved

Elderwood Senior Living of Lancaster's TCR fell 2.7 from 16.2 in 2019 to 13.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 16.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=16.2 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=13.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lancaster, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.1 · 292% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #192/257
  • PHOTO CareLink North
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CareLink North (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Elderwood Senior Living of Lancaster in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Elderwood Senior Living of Lancaster averages 11.1 TCR (292% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Elderwood Senior Living of Lancaster TCR series: 2019=16.2 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=13.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Elderwood Senior Living of Lancaster falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #192 safest of 257 Retirement communities, contin employers in Pennsylvania.

Elderwood Senior Living of Lancaster (26 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Elderwood Senior Living of Lancaster
Elderwood Senior Living of Lancaster (26 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Elderwood Senior Living of Lancaster has fewer employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 13.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 16.2 6.5 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Lancaster

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CareLink North 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Watermark By the Bay 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Encore Countryside Manor West 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suffolk Bickford 11.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE JB Muhsroom Service LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Liberty 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG Energy Center Harrisburg LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Regency at Yardley 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR DSH Enterprises 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta Palnt 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rpb 77 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wright County- Sheriff Department 11.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE TAMKO - Columbus 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Drury Inn & Suites - St. Louis St. Peters 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE ORBIS RPM Fremont 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gregori Construction - Florida 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.