Sheriffs' offices (except court functions only) · Minnesota

Wright County- Sheriff Department

Buffalo, MN · ~306 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wright County- Sheriff Department runs at 346% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheriffs' offices (except court functions only) workplace, earning a grade F.

Wright County- Sheriff Department: 11.1 TCR = 346% of Sheriffs' offices (except court functions only) BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wright County- Sheriff Department safety composite

Wright County- Sheriff Department scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 11.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wright County- Sheriff Department: 7.9 → 14.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 17.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.32× in 2022

Wright County- Sheriff Department's TCR rose 6.7 from 7.9 in 2019 to 14.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 17.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922120 · Buffalo, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.1 · 346% of ind

  • DART 14.6 DART
  • RANK #42/71
  • PHOTO Town of Simsbury Pol…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~306 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Town of Simsbury Police (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Wright County- Sheriff Department in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wright County- Sheriff Department averages 11.1 TCR (346% of the Sheriffs' offices (except court functions only) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wright County- Sheriff Department TCR series: 2019=7.9 · 2020=4 · 2021=17.7 · 2022=14.6 · BLS 3.2

Where Wright County- Sheriff Department falls in its industry

716 Sheriffs' offices (except cour establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 71 Sheriffs' offices (except cour employers in Minnesota.

Wright County- Sheriff Department (306 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Wright County- Sheriff Department
Wright County- Sheriff Department (306 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5

Wright County- Sheriff Department has more employees than the Sheriffs' offices (except court function median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 14.6 14.6 8 35 0
2021 17.7 16.0 6 46 0
2020 4.0 3.4 9 3 0
2019 7.9 1.1 18 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922120 · MN · Buffalo

716 Sheriffs' offices (except court functions only) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 74 employers in Buffalo, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Town of Simsbury Police 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yuma County Sheriff's Office 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR King County Sheriff's Office 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheriff's Office 11.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 320141 - Various Mobile 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mulcahy Nickolaus LLC 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE District One Hospital 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minnesota Community Care 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health One Buffalo (Buffalo Hospital) 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health One Buffalo 500 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1577 404 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1577 320 FTE
NAT-TCR 350076-ALB-TERMINAL 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0033-0033-00326 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0033-0033-02190 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-00975 11.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE PLI Cards Asheville 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bush Industries.com 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0126 - Garden Grove Ca Whse 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0374 - Lakeside Mi Whse 306 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.