Distribution of electric power · South Carolina

Electric Operations Building (Charleston)

North Charleston, SC · ~103 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Electric Operations Building (Charleston) runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade C.

Electric Operations Building (Charleston): 1.4 TCR = 118% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Electric Operations Building (Charleston) safety composite

Electric Operations Building (Charleston) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Electric Operations Building (Charleston) held a steady TCR band

Electric Operations Building (Charleston)'s TCR held near 0.1 from 1.9 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.9 · 2018=1.0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=1.0 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · North Charleston, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 1.4 · 118% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #46/86
  • PHOTO Toledo Edison
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Toledo Edison (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Electric Operations Building (Charleston) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Electric Operations Building (Charleston) averages 1.4 TCR (118% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Electric Operations Building (Charleston) TCR series: 2017=1.9 · 2018=1 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=1 · 2022=1 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Electric Operations Building (Charleston) falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 86 Distribution of electric power employers in South Carolina.

Electric Operations Building (Charleston) (103 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Electric Operations Building (Charleston)
Electric Operations Building (Charleston) (103 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Electric Operations Building (Charleston) has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2019 2.9 0.0 3 0 0
2018 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.9 1.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · SC · North Charleston

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 256 employers in North Charleston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Toledo Edison 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Penn Power 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BHE - Canon City Utility Dr (CO008) 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Precision Walls Inc-Columbia 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gulbrandsen Chemicals - Orangeburg Facility 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Parkway Products Seneca South Carolina 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michelin Tweel Technologies 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charleston County 2,601 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Goodwill Services 1,105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trident Medical Center 1,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR SRC Charleston ISS Division 815 FTE
NAT-TCR Berkots 759 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SJE-Rhombus 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Memorial Rehab 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Memorial Pediatrics - GMA 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Coast Co-op Eureka 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forest Parkway 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Abw 3000 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Abw 7060 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.