Electric power distribution systems · Minnesota

Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n.

Park Rapids, MN · ~30 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n. runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade C.

Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n.: 1.4 TCR = 118% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n. safety composite

Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n. held a steady TCR band

Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Park Rapids, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.4 · 118% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/85
  • PHOTO Electric Operations …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Electric Operations Building (Charleston) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n. averages 1.4 TCR (118% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n. falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 85 Electric power distribution sy employers in Minnesota.

Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n. (30 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n.
Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n. (30 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'n. has fewer employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.6 0.0 0 1 0
2019 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MN · Park Rapids

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 27 employers in Park Rapids, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Electric Operations Building (Charleston) 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toledo Edison 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Penn Power 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BHE - Canon City Utility Dr (CO008) 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nelson Nursery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Westland Dairy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pipestone Grow Finish 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Park Rapids Area Schools- ISD 309 309 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHI St. Joseph's Health 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4244 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph Area Health Services 219 FTE
NAT-TCR Diamond Pet Foods - Gaston 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1475 Harrison Rd 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Valentine Contractors 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockaway Home Care 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE SMD 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sheffield Manor 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Chemical Menasha Mfg. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hard and Soft Fishing 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.