Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing · Minnesota

Electro-Sensors, Inc.

Minnetonka, MN · ~36 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Electro-Sensors, Inc. runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Electro-Sensors, Inc.: 1.5 TCR = 47% of Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Electro-Sensors, Inc. safety composite

Electro-Sensors, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2021→2024

Electro-Sensors, Inc. injury rate improved

Electro-Sensors, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=3.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Minnetonka, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/17
  • PHOTO Erhardt + Leimer Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Erhardt + Leimer Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Electro-Sensors, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Electro-Sensors, Inc. averages 1.5 TCR (47% of the Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Electro-Sensors, Inc. TCR series: 2021=3.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Electro-Sensors, Inc. falls in its industry

322 Controllers for process variab establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 17 Controllers for process variab employers in Minnesota.

Electro-Sensors, Inc. (36 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Electro-Sensors, Inc.
Electro-Sensors, Inc. (36 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Electro-Sensors, Inc. has fewer employees than the Controllers for process variables (e.g., median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.1 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · MN · Minnetonka

322 Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 179 employers in Minnetonka, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Erhardt + Leimer Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Nason Company 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gems Sensors Plainville 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR RJG, Inc. - Corporate 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Prairie Moon Nursery 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience - Olivia MN R&D 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Counties Cooperative Litchfield 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2011-Stanton, MN (Monsanto Co.) 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN008 1,873 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Marsh 1,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN006 1,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN006 MINNETONKA-9800 HEALTH CARE LN 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR 241 - Huber Heights OH 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 020 - Alpine Ave Walker 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pilgrim's Douglas Truck Shop 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Carlisle Dry 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fleming Network & Security Services Inc. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aventer Services 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ketchikan Transportation 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dale R Yox Inc 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.