Electron beam welding equipment manufacturing · Illinois

Electron Beam Technologies, Inc.

Kankakee, IL · ~49 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Electron Beam Technologies, Inc. runs at 245% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electron beam welding equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Electron Beam Technologies, Inc.: 8.1 TCR = 245% of Electron beam welding equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Electron Beam Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Electron Beam Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2024

Electron Beam Technologies, Inc. injury rate improved

Electron Beam Technologies, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.0 from 6.9 in 2016 to 5.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 18.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=12.8 · 2021=18.0 · 2024=5.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333992 · Kankakee, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 245% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #10/10
  • PHOTO Oliver Technologies …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oliver Technologies Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Electron Beam Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Electron Beam Technologies, Inc. averages 8.1 TCR (245% of the Electron beam welding equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Electron Beam Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=12.8 · 2021=18 · 2024=5.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Electron Beam Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

129 Electron beam welding equipmen establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 10 Electron beam welding equipmen employers in Illinois.

Electron Beam Technologies, Inc. (49 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Electron Beam Technologies, Inc.
Electron Beam Technologies, Inc. (49 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Electron Beam Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Electron beam welding equipment manufact median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.9 3.9 3 0 0
2021 18.0 12.0 9 0 0
2020 12.8 6.4 6 0 0
2019 9.2 1.8 5 0 0
2018 3.7 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.9 4.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333992 · IL · Kankakee

129 Electron beam welding equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 105 employers in Kankakee, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oliver Technologies Inc. 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waconia MN 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Systems Division - West 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weld Mold Company 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Boller Construction Co., Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Pipelining INC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM. Aupperle & Sons, Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE RI Glass Group 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR RIVERSIDE HEALTH SYSTEM - 7240724 3,145 FTE
CITY-NEAR RIVERSIDE MEDICAL CENTER 2,562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kankakee SD #111 859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presence St. Mary's Hospital Kankakee 726 FTE
NAT-TCR Truewood by Merrill Henderson 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Quality Aluminum Forge 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Modernica Inc 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Regency Place Senior Living 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kenworth of Louisville 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stonecrest Healthcare 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE JAX J CC INC dba AMS CONSTRUCTION 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dakotaland Feeds Huron 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.