Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · California

Regency Place Senior Living

Sacramento, CA · ~49 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regency Place Senior Living runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade D.

Regency Place Senior Living: 8.1 TCR = 124% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regency Place Senior Living safety composite

Regency Place Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Regency Place Senior Living: 8.2 → 10.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.31× in 2024

Regency Place Senior Living's TCR rose 2.3 from 8.2 in 2021 to 10.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.1 · 124% of ind

  • DART 10.6 DART
  • RANK #381/739
  • PHOTO Royal Care of Avon P…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Royal Care of Avon Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Regency Place Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regency Place Senior Living averages 8.1 TCR (124% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regency Place Senior Living TCR series: 2021=8.2 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=10.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Regency Place Senior Living falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #381 safest of 739 Convalescent homes or convales employers in California.

Regency Place Senior Living (49 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Regency Place Senior Living
Regency Place Senior Living (49 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Regency Place Senior Living has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.6 10.6 4 0 0
2023 5.4 5.4 2 0 0
2021 8.2 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Sacramento

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Royal Care of Avon Park 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spruce LTC Group, LLC dba Bethany Woods Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pomeroy Living Sterling Skilled Rehabilitation 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ICC Exton LLC 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE LAJES FARMS INC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunview Shandon 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rawah-Napa County 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Farms 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Electron Beam Technologies, Inc. 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Truewood by Merrill Henderson 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Txdel - Del Rio 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rosecastle of Citrus 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Automated Systems of Tacoma 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wfs Jacksonville 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winnebago Landfill 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Columbia 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.