Instruments for measuring electrical quantities manufacturing · Oregon

Electronic Control Designs

Milwaukie, OR · ~21 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Electronic Control Designs runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Instruments for measuring electrical quantities manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Electronic Control Designs: 1.7 TCR = 51% of Instruments for measuring electrical quantities manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Electronic Control Designs safety composite

Electronic Control Designs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2021→2024

Electronic Control Designs injury rate improved

Electronic Control Designs's TCR fell 6.7 from 6.7 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=6.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334515 · Milwaukie, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 51% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Leonardo DRS
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Leonardo DRS (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Electronic Control Designs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Electronic Control Designs averages 1.7 TCR (51% of the Instruments for measuring electrical quantities manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Electronic Control Designs TCR series: 2021=6.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Electronic Control Designs falls in its industry

125 Instruments for measuring elec establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Instruments for measuring elec employers in Oregon.

Electronic Control Designs (21 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Electronic Control Designs
Electronic Control Designs (21 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Electronic Control Designs has fewer employees than the Instruments for measuring electrical qua median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334515 · OR · Milwaukie

125 Instruments for measuring electrical quantities manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 79 employers in Milwaukie, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Leonardo DRS 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aehr Headquarters 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Myers Power Products, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boston Semi Equipment LLC 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Giant Step Orchard 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lowell 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Capitol Farms, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scharf Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR345 PROVIDENCE MILWAUKIE HOSPITAL-MILWAUKIE 652 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000550 614 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bob's Red Mill Natural Foods 591 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPERVALU DISTRIBUTION CENTER - PORTLAND 34011 467 FTE
NAT-TCR Salt Lake City Dry 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Coastal Medical 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Altium Packaging - Allentown 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 072 - Belleville Rd Vanburen 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Asheville Humane Resources 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moscow ID EcoDistrict, LLC 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denison Industries, Inc. (Auto Foundry) 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Custom Caulking, Inc. 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.