Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · Oregon

Hermiston Power Plant

Hermiston, OR · ~21 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hermiston Power Plant runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade A.

Hermiston Power Plant: 0.5 TCR = 44% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hermiston Power Plant safety composite

Hermiston Power Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hermiston Power Plant held a steady TCR band

Hermiston Power Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Hermiston, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 44% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/16
  • PHOTO Conemaugh Generating…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Conemaugh Generating Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Hermiston Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hermiston Power Plant averages 0.5 TCR (44% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hermiston Power Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Hermiston Power Plant falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 16 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in Oregon.

Hermiston Power Plant (21 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hermiston Power Plant
Hermiston Power Plant (21 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Hermiston Power Plant has fewer employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · OR · Hermiston

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 65 employers in Hermiston, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Conemaugh Generating Station 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ENGIE North America - OSU 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turkey Point Plant Fossil 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie State Generating Company - Corporate Office 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Giant Step Orchard 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lowell 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Capitol Farms, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scharf Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6037 919 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6037 818 FTE
CITY-NEAR HERMISTON OR 550 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mj's Labor Services Inc. 507 FTE
NAT-TCR Comstar Enterprises Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR A. A. Boos & Sons, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Airwest Engineering 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Cannon San Diego 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Otay Mesa Energy Center 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Point Energy Center 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wolfskill Energy Center 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Delta Corporation 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.