Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers · Arizona

Electronic Responsible Recyclers DBA ER2

Mesa, AZ · ~69 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Electronic Responsible Recyclers DBA ER2 runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Electronic Responsible Recyclers DBA ER2: 0.6 TCR = 29% of Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Electronic Responsible Recyclers DBA ER2 safety composite

Electronic Responsible Recyclers DBA ER2 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Electronic Responsible Recyclers DBA ER2: 0.0 → 1.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 1.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.76× in 2024

Electronic Responsible Recyclers DBA ER2's TCR rose 1.1 from 0.0 in 2020 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Mesa, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 29% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #1/19
  • PHOTO Florida
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Florida (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Electronic Responsible Recyclers DBA ER2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Electronic Responsible Recyclers DBA ER2 averages 0.6 TCR (29% of the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Electronic Responsible Recyclers DBA ER2 TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.4 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 2.2

Where Electronic Responsible Recyclers DBA ER2 falls in its industry

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 19 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl employers in Arizona.

Electronic Responsible Recyclers DBA ER2 (69 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Electronic Responsible Recyclers DBA ER2
Electronic Responsible Recyclers DBA ER2 (69 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Electronic Responsible Recyclers DBA ER2 has more employees than the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · AZ · Mesa

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 565 employers in Mesa, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Florida 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caldwell Recyclers 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trademark Metals Recycling LLC - Sutton 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cirba Solutions Services US, LLC. 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Griffin Ranches, Inc. 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE TONOPAH PLANT 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goodyear Service Center 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Desert Vista Concrete, LLC 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZ001 4,193 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZAPW9668 AZA - RAMP PAX 3,181 FTE
CITY-NEAR 04-290370278-2 1,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Police Department H210 1,651 FTE
NAT-TCR Groveport - 2829 Rohr Road 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Leonardo Electroincs US 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR GMS Jonesboro 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Seaside Sales 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Merit Contracting 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Idahoan Foods, LLC - Rupert Plant 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Ligature - 0204 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Perma-Fix Northwest, Inc. (PFNW) 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.