Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers · New York

ELG Utica Alloys Inc., New York 2

Frankfort, NY · ~25 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ELG Utica Alloys Inc., New York 2 runs at 468% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

ELG Utica Alloys Inc., New York 2: 10.3 TCR = 468% of Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ELG Utica Alloys Inc., New York 2 safety composite

ELG Utica Alloys Inc., New York 2 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ELG Utica Alloys Inc., New York 2: 0.0 → 11.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 23.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2024

ELG Utica Alloys Inc., New York 2's TCR rose 11.5 from 0.0 in 2021 to 11.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 23.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Frankfort, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 468% of ind

  • DART 11.5 DART
  • RANK #35/39
  • PHOTO Staiman Recycling Co…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Staiman Recycling Corporation Williamsport (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

ELG Utica Alloys Inc., New York 2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ELG Utica Alloys Inc., New York 2 averages 10.3 TCR (468% of the Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ELG Utica Alloys Inc., New York 2 TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=23.2 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=11.5 · BLS 2.2

Where ELG Utica Alloys Inc., New York 2 falls in its industry

1,126 Metal scrap and waste merchant establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 39 Metal scrap and waste merchant employers in New York.

ELG Utica Alloys Inc., New York 2 (25 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ELG Utica Alloys Inc., New York 2
ELG Utica Alloys Inc., New York 2 (25 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

ELG Utica Alloys Inc., New York 2 has fewer employees than the Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesale median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.5 11.5 3 0 0
2023 6.4 6.4 2 0 0
2022 23.2 19.3 6 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · NY · Frankfort

1,126 Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 22 employers in Frankfort, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Staiman Recycling Corporation Williamsport 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tear A Part, LLC (Ogden) 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royal Oak Recycling Glassport PA 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recleim PA LLC 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Nurseries, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE 242 Madava New York 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenwood dairy Farm LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scipio Springs Dairy 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tractor Supply Company Distribution Center 0771 468 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC 0771 431 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maplehurst Bakeries 239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Frankfort 232 200 FTE
NAT-TCR Altus - Tuscaloosa 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Falcon Farms- Ga 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Speedy Concrete Cutting Fort Lauderdale 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Vandyke Elementary School 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Myers Coach Lines, Inc 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reid Park Zoo 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lanier Tire & Wheel, Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 1467 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.