Membership associations, civic or social · Virginia

Elizabeth Randolph Lewis Powhatan YMCA

Powhatan, VA · ~56 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Elizabeth Randolph Lewis Powhatan YMCA runs at 216% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Membership associations, civic or social workplace, earning a grade F.

Elizabeth Randolph Lewis Powhatan YMCA: 4.5 TCR = 216% of Membership associations, civic or social BLS 2.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Elizabeth Randolph Lewis Powhatan YMCA safety composite

Elizabeth Randolph Lewis Powhatan YMCA scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Elizabeth Randolph Lewis Powhatan YMCA: 0.0 → 5.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 18.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Elizabeth Randolph Lewis Powhatan YMCA's TCR rose 5.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 18.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813410 · Powhatan, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.5 · 216% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/19
  • PHOTO Carl H. Lindner YMCA…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carl H. Lindner YMCA Branch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Elizabeth Randolph Lewis Powhatan YMCA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Elizabeth Randolph Lewis Powhatan YMCA averages 4.5 TCR (216% of the Membership associations, civic or social BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Elizabeth Randolph Lewis Powhatan YMCA TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=18 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=5.4 · BLS 2.1

Where Elizabeth Randolph Lewis Powhatan YMCA falls in its industry

298 Membership associations, civic establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 19 Membership associations, civic employers in Virginia.

Elizabeth Randolph Lewis Powhatan YMCA (56 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Elizabeth Randolph Lewis Powhatan YMCA
Elizabeth Randolph Lewis Powhatan YMCA (56 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Elizabeth Randolph Lewis Powhatan YMCA has fewer employees than the Membership associations, civic or social median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 6.3 6.3 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.5 6.5 1 0 0
2017 18.0 18.0 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813410 · VA · Powhatan

298 Membership associations, civic or social employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 25 employers in Powhatan, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carl H. Lindner YMCA Branch 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hockomock Area YMCA 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR OCY - BDP 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frank J. Thornton YMCA Aquatic Center 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE PACKING HOUSE 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE PORTSMOUTH DIST 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 206-NiSource-Fredericksburg VA-Commerce 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Contruction Utilities INC. 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5847 262 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5847 244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colony Construction Inc 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR Construction 117 FTE
NAT-TCR Medical Associates - Tug Valley 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Webster Nursery 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Udfw 4681 (Fort Wayne - F) 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR D&W Fine Pack 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shelter Enterprises, Inc. 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roseville, MN (TimeComm) 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Georgia Truss Systems LLC 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allied Refrigeration Inc. 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.