Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) m · California

Elk Grove-IP

Elk Grove, CA · ~138 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Elk Grove-IP runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) m workplace, earning a grade B.

Elk Grove-IP: 2.2 TCR = 67% of Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) m BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Elk Grove-IP safety composite

Elk Grove-IP scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2018→2021

Elk Grove-IP injury rate improved

Elk Grove-IP's TCR fell 1.7 from 2.9 in 2018 to 1.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.9 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322130 · Elk Grove, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 67% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #6/15
  • PHOTO Gold Bond Building P…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gold Bond Building Products, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Elk Grove-IP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Elk Grove-IP averages 2.2 TCR (67% of the Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) m BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Elk Grove-IP TCR series: 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Elk Grove-IP falls in its industry

181 Paperboard (e.g., can/drum sto establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 15 Paperboard (e.g., can/drum sto employers in California.

Elk Grove-IP (138 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 138 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Elk Grove-IP
Elk Grove-IP (138 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 138 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Elk Grove-IP has more employees than the Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, contai median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2020 2.3 1.8 4 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 3 0 0
2018 2.9 2.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322130 · CA · Elk Grove

181 Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) m employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 134 employers in Elk Grove, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gold Bond Building Products, LLC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Covington Mill 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper Company 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NGC- Pryor Plant 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Westerlay Orchids LP 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danell Custom Harvesting LLC - DCH629 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sustainable Labor Solutions, Inc 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE RLH Fire Protection 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - Sacramento 2,924 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 601 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CCHCS - 042 1,408 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - ELK GROVE 1,404 FTE
NAT-TCR Golden Corral 590 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kerry/Fleischmann's Vinegar - North Rose 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dot Foods, Inc.- University Park 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Silarx Pharmaceutical 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oklahoma Tire Recyclers LLC 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Humco - Texarkana 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riviera Sun, Inc. 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winter Park Construction 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.