Warehousing and storage, general merchandise · North Carolina

Elkin Distribution Center

Elkin, NC · ~72 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Elkin Distribution Center runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

Elkin Distribution Center: 2.7 TCR = 47% of Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Elkin Distribution Center safety composite

Elkin Distribution Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2024

Elkin Distribution Center injury rate improved

Elkin Distribution Center's TCR fell 1.7 from 3.0 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Elkin, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.7 · 47% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #150/330
  • PHOTO PA - PepsiCo
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PA - PepsiCo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Elkin Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Elkin Distribution Center averages 2.7 TCR (47% of the Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Elkin Distribution Center TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 5.8

Where Elkin Distribution Center falls in its industry

9,477 Warehousing and storage, gener establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #150 safest of 330 Warehousing and storage, gener employers in North Carolina.

Elkin Distribution Center (72 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Elkin Distribution Center
Elkin Distribution Center (72 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Elkin Distribution Center has fewer employees than the Warehousing and storage, general merchan median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2023 5.8 5.8 4 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 4.3 2.9 3 0 0
2019 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2018 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2017 4.1 0.0 4 0 0
2016 3.0 3.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NC · Elkin

9,477 Warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 40 employers in Elkin, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PA - PepsiCo 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 30062 - CAPSTONE BEK OKC OK 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3933 GEODIS LOGISTICS 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Branch 4935 - Ontario 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Terrell and Johmmy Williams 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Toney Lumber Company, Inc. 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hickory Operations Center 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE French Broad Electric Membership Corporation - Headquarters 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC - Elkin 380 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1337 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC 343 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1337 330 FTE
NAT-TCR EnerSys Carrollton 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lincoln Park Manor, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Decorah Store 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bytec Resource Management, Inc 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ferry Electric Company 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Federal Flange 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Electric Coil/Rail Products International- Columbus 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE 190-Detroit 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.