Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Pennsylvania

Elm Terrace Gardens

Lansdale, PA · ~176 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Elm Terrace Gardens runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Elm Terrace Gardens: 4.1 TCR = 108% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Elm Terrace Gardens safety composite

Elm Terrace Gardens scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2022

Elm Terrace Gardens injury rate improved

Elm Terrace Gardens's TCR fell 1.9 from 4.9 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.9 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lansdale, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.1 · 108% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #45/257
  • PHOTO Moorings Park Nursin…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~176 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Moorings Park Nursing Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Elm Terrace Gardens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Elm Terrace Gardens averages 4.1 TCR (108% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Elm Terrace Gardens TCR series: 2016=4.9 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=3 · BLS 3.8

Where Elm Terrace Gardens falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 257 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Elm Terrace Gardens (176 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Elm Terrace Gardens
Elm Terrace Gardens (176 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Elm Terrace Gardens has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.0 2.5 6 0 0
2021 4.4 4.1 13 0 0
2020 5.5 4.8 8 0 0
2019 5.7 3.8 9 0 0
2018 2.9 2.9 4 0 0
2017 2.3 2.3 3 0 0
2016 4.9 4.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Lansdale

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 64 employers in Lansdale, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Moorings Park Nursing Services 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Seabrook of Hilton Head 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LCS Sandhill Cove LLC 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primrose Retirement Community of Pueblo 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Swartley Bros. Engineers, Inc 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Renick Brothers Construction 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Secant Group 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stryten Energy 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Living Branches 693 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansdale Hospital 573 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAES - Lansdale 467 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cobham EW & Integrated Solutions (EIS) 450 FTE
NAT-TCR Carolina Pines 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Food City Store #706 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Tops #359 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 810 - Findlay DC 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Automated Casting Facility 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summit Polymers Inc. - Syntech Plant 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burnette Foods, Hartford 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raceland Raw Sugar LLC 176 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.