Real estate property managers' offices, residential · Tennessee

Elmington Property Management

Nashville, TN · ~485 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Elmington Property Management runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Real estate property managers' offices, residential workplace, earning a grade F.

Elmington Property Management: 3.2 TCR = 228% of Real estate property managers' offices, residential BLS 1.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Elmington Property Management safety composite

Elmington Property Management scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2018→2024

Elmington Property Management injury rate improved

Elmington Property Management's TCR fell 2.8 from 6.6 in 2018 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.6 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531311 · Nashville, TN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.2 · 228% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #4/11
  • PHOTO Forest Glen Assisted…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 109 inj
  • SIZE ~485 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Forest Glen Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Elmington Property Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Elmington Property Management averages 3.2 TCR (228% of the Real estate property managers' offices, residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Elmington Property Management TCR series: 2018=6.6 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=3 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 1.4

Where Elmington Property Management falls in its industry

500 Real estate property managers' establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 11 Real estate property managers' employers in Tennessee.

Elmington Property Management (485 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Elmington Property Management
Elmington Property Management (485 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Elmington Property Management has more employees than the Real estate property managers' offices, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 2.5 21 0 0
2023 3.9 1.6 27 0 0
2022 3.0 1.8 25 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2018 6.6 1.1 35 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531311 · TN · Nashville

500 Real estate property managers' offices, residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 1,187 employers in Nashville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Forest Glen Assisted Living 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Excel Property Management Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regional Management, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kings Point in Tamarac 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bonnell Aluminum, Inc. - Carthage 485 FTE
STATE-SIZE FHI MEM 486 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lawson Electric company 483 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tenneco Smithville 481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parallon Enterprises, LLC 15,267 FTE
CITY-NEAR METROPOLITAN GOVT. OF NASHVILLE,& DAVIDSON COUNTY 10,278 FTE
CITY-NEAR METRO NASHVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS 9,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR TriStar Centennial Medical Center 3,106 FTE
NAT-TCR Wilson Tool International 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kelly Supply Company - Grand Island 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin Armory Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR San Diego 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Golden State Foods 485 FTE
NAT-SIZE Viega LLC - Kansas 485 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gulfstream Dallas 485 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABB Senatobia 485 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.