Engineering research and development laboratories or services · Florida

Embraer Engineering Technology Center

Melbourne, FL · ~137 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Embraer Engineering Technology Center runs at 176% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Engineering research and development laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade D.

Embraer Engineering Technology Center: 0.9 TCR = 176% of Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Embraer Engineering Technology Center safety composite

Embraer Engineering Technology Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Embraer Engineering Technology Center: 0.0 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2.08× in 2024

Embraer Engineering Technology Center's TCR rose 1.8 from 0.0 in 2022 to 1.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Melbourne, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 0.9 · 176% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #7/8
  • PHOTO Abramson Research Ce…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~137 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Abramson Research Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Embraer Engineering Technology Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Embraer Engineering Technology Center averages 0.9 TCR (176% of the Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Embraer Engineering Technology Center TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 0.5

Where Embraer Engineering Technology Center falls in its industry

319 Engineering research and devel establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Engineering research and devel employers in Florida.

Embraer Engineering Technology Center (137 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Embraer Engineering Technology Center
Embraer Engineering Technology Center (137 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Embraer Engineering Technology Center has fewer employees than the Engineering research and development lab median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2023 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · FL · Melbourne

319 Engineering research and development laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 305 employers in Melbourne, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Abramson Research Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Folsom Campus 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Applied Molecular Evolution AME 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Alsip Tech. Center 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE PWC-West County Energy Center 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hartshorn Tampa 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE McEnany Roofing, Inc T 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bergelectric Corp. FL 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-A458 4,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nextech HVACR 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health First Medical Group 1,787 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlantic Contracting and Specialties LLC - Albany 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR O&M Burlington 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HPMP Boonville Facility 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR EC Company - Albany 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fisher Auto Parts - Reg 701 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medford Composites 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buckeye Ready-Mix, LLC Plant 6/Office 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fernley 137 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.