Police and fire departments, combined · Minnesota

Emergency Services Building

Perham, MN · ~32 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emergency Services Building runs at 246% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Police and fire departments, combined workplace, earning a grade F.

Emergency Services Building: 7.9 TCR = 246% of Police and fire departments, combined BLS 3.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emergency Services Building safety composite

Emergency Services Building scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 7.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2024

Emergency Services Building injury rate improved

Emergency Services Building's TCR fell 3.4 from 14.9 in 2016 to 11.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.9 · 2017=11.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=11.3 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=10.8 · 2024=11.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922120 · Perham, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 246% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/71
  • PHOTO Minneapolis Police D…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Minneapolis Police Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Emergency Services Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Emergency Services Building averages 7.9 TCR (246% of the Police and fire departments, combined BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Emergency Services Building TCR series: 2016=14.9 · 2017=11.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=11.3 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=10.8 · 2024=11.5 · BLS 3.2

Where Emergency Services Building falls in its industry

716 Police and fire departments, c establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 71 Police and fire departments, c employers in Minnesota.

Emergency Services Building (32 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Emergency Services Building
Emergency Services Building (32 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 9.5

Emergency Services Building has fewer employees than the Police and fire departments, combined median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.5 0.0 1 0 0
2023 10.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 10.4 10.4 1 0 0
2020 11.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 11.8 11.8 1 0 0
2016 14.9 14.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922120 · MN · Perham

716 Police and fire departments, combined employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 29 employers in Perham, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Minneapolis Police Department 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hutchinson Police Services 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maricopa County - Sheriff (500/ 510) 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Herrin City Hall 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE MN Farm 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz SE Office 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE High Bridge Combined Cycle 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steele Waseca Coop Electric 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3061_5905 552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barrel O'Fun SNack Foods Co., LLC 516 FTE
CITY-NEAR Perham Health 484 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shearer's Foods - PHM 449 FTE
NAT-TCR Pro Ex Extrusion 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Londonderry Production Center 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Eskridge, Inc 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR XRN 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hoffer Pest Solutions 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mackinaw 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alamo Door Systems of Texas, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nytric Electrical Contractors, LLC 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.