Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire · Connecticut

Emerson / Appleton GRP LLC

East Granby, CT · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emerson / Appleton GRP LLC runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire workplace, earning a grade B.

Emerson / Appleton GRP LLC: 2.3 TCR = 68% of Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emerson / Appleton GRP LLC safety composite

Emerson / Appleton GRP LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Emerson / Appleton GRP LLC: 4.4 → 7.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.8 TCR · DART/TCR 3.43× in 2024

Emerson / Appleton GRP LLC's TCR rose 3.3 from 4.4 in 2016 to 7.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335929 · East Granby, CT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 68% of ind

  • DART 7.8 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO Catawba
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Catawba (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Emerson / Appleton GRP LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Emerson / Appleton GRP LLC averages 2.3 TCR (68% of the Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Emerson / Appleton GRP LLC TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=7.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Emerson / Appleton GRP LLC falls in its industry

144 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, employers in Connecticut.

Emerson / Appleton GRP LLC (28 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Emerson / Appleton GRP LLC
Emerson / Appleton GRP LLC (28 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Emerson / Appleton GRP LLC has fewer employees than the Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.8 7.8 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2016 4.4 4.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335929 · CT · East Granby

144 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 35 employers in East Granby, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Catawba 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Champlain Cable Corporation 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prysmian Cables and Systems USA, LLC 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trans Cable International 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE New Haven Harbor Station 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Road Generating Company LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE New York Division 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Opus Inspection Inc. 1,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR Envirotest Systems Corporation 1,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR ETest Corporation 1,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carmel Staffing Solutions 1,087 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 8026 - Moyock 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 9236 - E University 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Roberts Health Centre, Inc 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Van Kempen Electric Inc 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hillcrest Lumber, Ltd. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atomic Cowgirl Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE ROA-ODFL 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royal Adhesives 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.