Air-conditioning compressors (except motor vehicle) manufacturing · Missouri
Emerson Climate Technologies
Lebanon, MO · ~829 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 0.9
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Emerson Climate Technologies runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Air-conditioning compressors (except motor vehicle) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 0.9
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 16
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Emerson Climate Technologies's OSHA Total Case Rate of 0.9 to the Air-conditioning compressors (except motor vehicle) manufacturing BLS benchmark of 3.3 (29% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Emerson Climate Technologies's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where Emerson Climate Technologies falls in its industry
485 Air-conditioning compressors ( establishmentsSafer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.
Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 18 Air-conditioning compressors ( employers in Missouri.
Trend analysis for Emerson Climate Technologies
Between 2016 and 2017, Emerson Climate Technologies's Total Case Rate worsened from 0.9 to 1.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 21% increase across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2016, at a TCR of 0.9, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 1.0, a spread of 0.2 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Emerson Climate Technologies recorded 16 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 16 injuries shown on this page for Emerson Climate Technologies are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 333415 - Air-conditioning compressors (except motor vehicle) manufacturing.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2017)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
6 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 1,734,553 hours worked = 0.69 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Emerson Climate Technologies (this establishment) | 0.95 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Coolers, refrigeration, manufacturing industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 333415 |
| Missouri state avg (all industries) | 4.57 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Emerson Climate Technologies to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2017: 9 reportable incidents · 9 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 7 reportable incidents · 7 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Emerson Climate Technologies's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Air-conditioning compressors (except motor vehicle) manufacturing peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 29% of the Air-conditioning compressors (except motor vehicle) manufacturing benchmark, Emerson Climate Technologies reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Air-conditioning compressors (except motor vehicle) manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Emerson Climate Technologies's safety grade?
How many injuries has Emerson Climate Technologies reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Missouri, and by nearby establishments in Lebanon - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~0.9)
Similar size (~829 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.