Building cleaning services, janitorial · Missouri

J&R Investments DBA Woodley Building Maintanence

Kansas City, MO · ~830 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J&R Investments DBA Woodley Building Maintanence runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade A.

J&R Investments DBA Woodley Building Maintanence: 1.4 TCR = 31% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J&R Investments DBA Woodley Building Maintanence safety composite

J&R Investments DBA Woodley Building Maintanence scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

J&R Investments DBA Woodley Building Maintanence held a steady TCR band

J&R Investments DBA Woodley Building Maintanence's TCR held near 0.2 from 1.3 in 2023 to 1.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=1.3 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Kansas City, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 31% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #14/96
  • PHOTO Pritchard Industries…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~830 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pritchard Industries, LLC. - NY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

J&R Investments DBA Woodley Building Maintanence in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J&R Investments DBA Woodley Building Maintanence averages 1.4 TCR (31% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J&R Investments DBA Woodley Building Maintanence TCR series: 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 4.5

Where J&R Investments DBA Woodley Building Maintanence falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 96 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Missouri.

J&R Investments DBA Woodley Building Maintanence (830 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate J&R Investments DBA Woodley Building Maintanence
J&R Investments DBA Woodley Building Maintanence (830 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

J&R Investments DBA Woodley Building Maintanence has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 7 0 0
2023 1.3 1.3 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · MO · Kansas City

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 1,023 employers in Kansas City, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pritchard Industries, LLC. - NY 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT MISS DELTA COMM COLLEGE 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DMC Sinai-Grace Hospital 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ashe Memorial Hospital 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Emerson Climate Technologies 829 FTE
STATE-SIZE MO_St. Ann_750 NW Plaza_call ctr_90304000 828 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hubbell Power System - Centralia 827 FTE
STATE-SIZE U.S. Army Ft Leonard Wood Garrison 826 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mass Service Organization 11,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hallmark Cards Mass Channel 11,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Merchandising Services (GMS) 9,548 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Mercy - Missouri 7,709 FTE
NAT-TCR Aquatic Sales Solutions 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Aurora Sheet Plant 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CraneWorks LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Polytex Fibers LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Njbou - Bound Brook 830 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wielm - Elm Grove 830 FTE
NAT-SIZE N Anna Pwr Sta 830 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tower Semiconductor 830 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.