Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · New Jersey

Emf Logistics, Inc

Hackensack, NJ · ~151 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emf Logistics, Inc runs at 282% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Emf Logistics, Inc: 18.3 TCR = 282% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emf Logistics, Inc safety composite

Emf Logistics, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
B 3.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.9

2022→2024

Emf Logistics, Inc injury rate improved

Emf Logistics, Inc's TCR fell 11.9 from 21.0 in 2022 to 9.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 25.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=21.0 · 2023=25.0 · 2024=9.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Hackensack, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 18.3 · 282% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #200/211
  • PHOTO ALDERWOOD HUB (ORALD)
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~151 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ALDERWOOD HUB (ORALD) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Emf Logistics, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Emf Logistics, Inc averages 18.3 TCR (282% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Emf Logistics, Inc TCR series: 2022=21 · 2023=25 · 2024=9 · BLS 6.5

Where Emf Logistics, Inc falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #200 safest of 211 Express delivery services (exc employers in New Jersey.

Emf Logistics, Inc (151 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Emf Logistics, Inc
Emf Logistics, Inc (151 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Emf Logistics, Inc has more employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.0 3.0 6 0 0
2023 25.0 20.8 18 0 0
2022 21.0 21.0 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NJ · Hackensack

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 63 employers in Hackensack, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ALDERWOOD HUB (ORALD) 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 601 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precison Delivery LLC. 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CJB Logistics 18.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE BRANCH - NJ - New Jersey Central 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barry Callebaut US - PennChoc 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Foodsource 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barrington NJ 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hackensack University Medical 7,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hackensack University Medical Center 7,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR J. Fletcher Creamer & Son Inc. 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR AHSHACK 532 FTE
NAT-TCR Life Care Center of Coeur Dalene 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodbury Estates 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR American House - Bonita Springs I/II 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Feld Entertainment D36 18.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE ChampionX Sugar Land 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE AHG Crossroads Licensee, LLC 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE 53EE 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Care Center of Ooltewah 151 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.