HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors · Maryland

Emjay Engineering & Construction CO. Inc.

Baltimore, MD · ~154 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emjay Engineering & Construction CO. Inc. runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Emjay Engineering & Construction CO. Inc.: 2.1 TCR = 76% of HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emjay Engineering & Construction CO. Inc. safety composite

Emjay Engineering & Construction CO. Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Emjay Engineering & Construction CO. Inc. held a steady TCR band

Emjay Engineering & Construction CO. Inc.'s TCR held near 0.3 from 1.6 in 2020 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.6 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Baltimore, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 76% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #50/121
  • PHOTO Aabco Sheet Metal Co
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aabco Sheet Metal Co (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Emjay Engineering & Construction CO. Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Emjay Engineering & Construction CO. Inc. averages 2.1 TCR (76% of the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Emjay Engineering & Construction CO. Inc. TCR series: 2020=1.6 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Emjay Engineering & Construction CO. Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 121 HVAC (heating, ventilation and employers in Maryland.

Emjay Engineering & Construction CO. Inc. (154 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Emjay Engineering & Construction CO. Inc.
Emjay Engineering & Construction CO. Inc. (154 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Emjay Engineering & Construction CO. Inc. has more employees than the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-condi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2023 3.4 0.7 5 0 0
2020 1.6 0.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MD · Baltimore

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aabco Sheet Metal Co 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sideburn Support Center 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office-Main 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comfort Systems USA Syracuse 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bryant Group Inc. 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE MD-ABERD01-Aberdeen MD 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2244 LOWE S OF COLUMBIA MD 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2826 LOWE S OF N. FREDERICK MD 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Able Home Care LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1528 - Bethel 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wright Brothers Contracting, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sekisui Kydex 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Taylor Forge Engineered Systems 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2249 - Ansonia 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCPA Headquarters 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2486 - South Lebanon 154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.