Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation · Missouri

Empac Group North

Washington, MO · ~19 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Empac Group North runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation workplace, earning a grade A.

Empac Group North: 0.9 TCR = 23% of Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Empac Group North safety composite

Empac Group North scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Empac Group North held a steady TCR band

Empac Group North's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Washington, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/84
  • PHOTO Goodwill Industries …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Goodwill Industries of Orange County Yale ADC Warehouse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Empac Group North in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Empac Group North averages 0.9 TCR (23% of the Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Empac Group North TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Empac Group North falls in its industry

1,455 Job training, vocational rehab establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 84 Job training, vocational rehab employers in Missouri.

Empac Group North (19 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Empac Group North
Empac Group North (19 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Empac Group North has fewer employees than the Job training, vocational rehabilitation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · MO · Washington

1,455 Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 62 employers in Washington, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Goodwill Industries of Orange County Yale ADC Warehouse 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ServiceSource HQ 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR KANDU Ind Adel St 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rushville Shares 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms MOC 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics MO Rocky Point 006-0138-RP 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stokes-Mayberry Gin Co., Inc. 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE King City Seed, Inc 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL WASHINGTON 1,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Instrumentation : Washington SPO215 554 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fluid Connectors : Washington SPO215 471 FTE
CITY-NEAR 172 398 FTE
NAT-TCR MMR Constructors, Inc. - South Carolina Operations 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Andersons Inc. - Overland Park 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Guilford County Child Support Enforcement - High Point 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Youngs Tank, Inc. 0.9 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.