Work experience centers (i.e., sheltered workshops) · Missouri

Empac Industrial Resources South

Sullivan, MO · ~95 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Empac Industrial Resources South runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Work experience centers (i.e., sheltered workshops) workplace, earning a grade C.

Empac Industrial Resources South: 3.7 TCR = 97% of Work experience centers (i.e., sheltered workshops) BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Empac Industrial Resources South safety composite

Empac Industrial Resources South scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.2

2016→2024

Empac Industrial Resources South injury rate improved

Empac Industrial Resources South's TCR fell 6.2 from 8.7 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.7 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=4.8 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Sullivan, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 97% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #50/84
  • PHOTO Henderson Hall - For…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Henderson Hall - Fort Myers (19) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Empac Industrial Resources South in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Empac Industrial Resources South averages 3.7 TCR (97% of the Work experience centers (i.e., sheltered workshops) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Empac Industrial Resources South TCR series: 2016=8.7 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=4.8 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Empac Industrial Resources South falls in its industry

1,455 Work experience centers (i.e., establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 84 Work experience centers (i.e., employers in Missouri.

Empac Industrial Resources South (95 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Empac Industrial Resources South
Empac Industrial Resources South (95 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Empac Industrial Resources South has more employees than the Work experience centers (i.e., sheltered median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 4.8 0.0 2 0 0
2021 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.4 3.7 4 0 0
2017 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2016 8.7 5.2 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · MO · Sullivan

1,455 Work experience centers (i.e., sheltered workshops) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 26 employers in Sullivan, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Henderson Hall - Fort Myers (19) 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wyoming Store 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 405 Brockport 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harrisburg (1150 Building) 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waterhout Headquarters 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Septagon Construction Company, Incorporated-Sedalia 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herzog Contracting Corp - KC Streetcar Constructors 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE JPI Glass 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aerofil Technology 413 FTE
CITY-NEAR Missouri Baptist Sullivan Hospital 328 FTE
CITY-NEAR 65 310 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 65 309 FTE
NAT-TCR Valley 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 084 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Premium Manufacturing Inc dba Evans Manufacturing 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Flagstaff 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sanderson MacLeod, Inc. 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE location 11741 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vissering Construction Company 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lubbock 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.