Level gauges, radiation-type, manufacturing · Indiana

Endress + Hauser Automation Instrumentation

Greenwood, IN · ~122 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Endress + Hauser Automation Instrumentation runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Level gauges, radiation-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Endress + Hauser Automation Instrumentation: 1.6 TCR = 50% of Level gauges, radiation-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Endress + Hauser Automation Instrumentation safety composite

Endress + Hauser Automation Instrumentation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Endress + Hauser Automation Instrumentation held a steady TCR band

Endress + Hauser Automation Instrumentation's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.7 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334519 · Greenwood, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 50% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK P36
  • PHOTO Magnetic Analysis Co…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Magnetic Analysis Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Endress + Hauser Automation Instrumentation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Endress + Hauser Automation Instrumentation averages 1.6 TCR (50% of the Level gauges, radiation-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Endress + Hauser Automation Instrumentation TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=1 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Endress + Hauser Automation Instrumentation falls in its industry

128 Level gauges, radiation-type, establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Endress + Hauser Automation Instrumentation (122 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Endress + Hauser Automation Instrumentation
Endress + Hauser Automation Instrumentation (122 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Endress + Hauser Automation Instrumentation has more employees than the Level gauges, radiation-type, manufactur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.5 1.8 4 0 0
2022 1.8 0.9 2 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2020 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2017 1.7 0.8 2 0 0
2016 2.7 0.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334519 · IN · Greenwood

128 Level gauges, radiation-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 168 employers in Greenwood, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Magnetic Analysis Corporation 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2967-OK4 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ronan Engineering Company Measurements div 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MN157 MOCON, INC. 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cort Acre Egg Farm 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hi-Grade Egg Producers & Processors 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant 1 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan Cristiani Excavating 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - IND9 2,588 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND9 2,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ulta Beauty GWD 850 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ulta Beauty 715 FTE
NAT-TCR Leather Brothers, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR KCTC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR WakeMed Brier Creek Healthplex 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Jostens Shelbyville 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Edgewood Village 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Gardens at Blue Ridge 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tishomingo Manor Nursing Home 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hubbard (Walpole) 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.