Door and jamb assemblies, metal, manufacturing · North Carolina

Endura Products Inc, Sill Plant

Colfax, NC · ~124 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Endura Products Inc, Sill Plant runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Door and jamb assemblies, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Endura Products Inc, Sill Plant: 3.0 TCR = 91% of Door and jamb assemblies, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Endura Products Inc, Sill Plant safety composite

Endura Products Inc, Sill Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2017→2024

Endura Products Inc, Sill Plant injury rate improved

Endura Products Inc, Sill Plant's TCR fell 1.2 from 2.9 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332321 · Colfax, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 91% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #7/15
  • PHOTO Boon Edam
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Boon Edam (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Endura Products Inc, Sill Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Endura Products Inc, Sill Plant averages 3.0 TCR (91% of the Door and jamb assemblies, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Endura Products Inc, Sill Plant TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Endura Products Inc, Sill Plant falls in its industry

515 Door and jamb assemblies, meta establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 15 Door and jamb assemblies, meta employers in North Carolina.

Endura Products Inc, Sill Plant (124 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Endura Products Inc, Sill Plant
Endura Products Inc, Sill Plant (124 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Endura Products Inc, Sill Plant has more employees than the Door and jamb assemblies, metal, manufac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 3 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 4 0 0
2022 3.8 3.8 4 0 0
2021 9.8 7.1 11 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2019 2.1 1.1 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332321 · NC · Colfax

515 Door and jamb assemblies, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 29 employers in Colfax, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Boon Edam 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Universal Window and Door 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kawneer Company, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office - 01 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Western Region Operations Complex (Asheville) 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Commercial Grade 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benitez Electric INC 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverlanding 510 FTE
CITY-NEAR River Landing at Sandy Ridge 440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phillips Corporation - Commercial Division 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foster-Caviness Company Inc 161 FTE
NAT-TCR PBE-Bowling Green 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Lhp Pascack Food 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at United Club Sfo App Care 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodruff & Sons, Inc.-FL 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rancho Guadalupe 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mid-City Supply Company, Inc. 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA IL Matteson Plant 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE MFM Contracting Corp 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.