Transmission of electric power · Massachusetts
Enel Green Power North America
Andover, MA · ~999 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 0.7
- Avg TCR
- 1.2
- Industry avg
- 1
- Fatality
The verdict
Enel Green Power North America runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Transmission of electric power workplace, earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 0.7
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 1.2
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 1
- worker fatalities on record
Grade compares Enel Green Power North America's OSHA Total Case Rate of 0.7 to the Transmission of electric power BLS benchmark of 1.2 (55% of benchmark) across 3 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Enel Green Power North America's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 1.2 industry benchmark.
Where Enel Green Power North America falls in its industry
335 Transmission of electric power establishmentsSafer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.
Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Transmission of electric power employers in Massachusetts.
Trend analysis for Enel Green Power North America
Between 2017 and 2022, Enel Green Power North America's Total Case Rate worsened from 0.5 to 0.8 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 85% increase across 5 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2017, at a TCR of 0.5, while 2022 saw the highest rate, at 0.8, a spread of 0.4 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 3 reporting years, Enel Green Power North America recorded 16 total injuries and illnesses and 1 fatality. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 3-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 16 injuries, 7 illnesses, and 1 fatality shown on this page for Enel Green Power North America are sourced from its own 3 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 221121 - Transmission of electric power.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2022)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
7 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 3,531,840 hours worked = 0.40 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Enel Green Power North America (this establishment) | 0.66 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 3-year avg |
| Electric power control industry avg | 1.20 | BLS IIF, NAICS 221121 |
| Massachusetts state avg (all industries) | 4.94 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Enel Green Power North America to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2022: 15 reportable incidents · 8 injuries, 7 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 6 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 0 illnesses, 1 fatality - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 3 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 8 | 7 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Enel Green Power North America's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Transmission of electric power peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 55% of the Transmission of electric power benchmark, Enel Green Power North America reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Transmission of electric power sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Enel Green Power North America's safety grade?
How many injuries has Enel Green Power North America reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Massachusetts, and by nearby establishments in Andover - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~0.7)
Similar size (~999 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.