Electric power distribution systems · Arizona

Energy Resources H300 - Electric Distribution

Mesa, AZ · ~38 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Energy Resources H300 - Electric Distribution runs at 593% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade F.

Energy Resources H300 - Electric Distribution: 7.1 TCR = 593% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Energy Resources H300 - Electric Distribution safety composite

Energy Resources H300 - Electric Distribution scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.1

2016→2024

Energy Resources H300 - Electric Distribution injury rate improved

Energy Resources H300 - Electric Distribution's TCR fell 10.1 from 10.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 23.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.1 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=14.3 · 2019=23.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Mesa, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 593% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #49/52
  • PHOTO RICHMOND SERVICE CEN…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RICHMOND SERVICE CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Energy Resources H300 - Electric Distribution in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Energy Resources H300 - Electric Distribution averages 7.1 TCR (593% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Energy Resources H300 - Electric Distribution TCR series: 2016=10.1 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=14.3 · 2019=23.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Energy Resources H300 - Electric Distribution falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 52 Electric power distribution sy employers in Arizona.

Energy Resources H300 - Electric Distribution (38 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Energy Resources H300 - Electric Distribution
Energy Resources H300 - Electric Distribution (38 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Energy Resources H300 - Electric Distribution has fewer employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.3 3.1 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.7 6.7 1 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 23.6 13.5 7 0 0
2018 14.3 10.7 4 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2016 10.1 10.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · AZ · Mesa

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 565 employers in Mesa, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RICHMOND SERVICE CENTER 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Electric T&D- Meter Services and Warehouse 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wytheville Svc Ctr 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Canton Operating - 1037 Marietta Hwy Canton 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eloy, AZ 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Office 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Casa Grande Service Center 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZ001 4,193 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZAPW9668 AZA - RAMP PAX 3,181 FTE
CITY-NEAR 04-290370278-2 1,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Police Department H210 1,651 FTE
NAT-TCR Bangor 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Jacksonville, Fl 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Saint Francis Hospital South 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR River Oaks 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Golden State Landscaping 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE E Colonial 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rosewood Manor 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Oxford Aluminum 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.