Flexographic printing presses manufacturing · Minnesota

Engage Technologies Corporation

Brooklyn Park, MN · ~90 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Engage Technologies Corporation runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Flexographic printing presses manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Engage Technologies Corporation: 1.7 TCR = 52% of Flexographic printing presses manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Engage Technologies Corporation safety composite

Engage Technologies Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Engage Technologies Corporation: 1.4 → 2.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.64× in 2021

Engage Technologies Corporation's TCR rose 0.8 from 1.4 in 2017 to 2.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333244 · Brooklyn Park, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 52% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Videojet Technologie…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Videojet Technologies, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Engage Technologies Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Engage Technologies Corporation averages 1.7 TCR (52% of the Flexographic printing presses manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Engage Technologies Corporation TCR series: 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Engage Technologies Corporation falls in its industry

82 Flexographic printing presses establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Flexographic printing presses employers in Minnesota.

Engage Technologies Corporation (90 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Engage Technologies Corporation
Engage Technologies Corporation (90 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Engage Technologies Corporation has more employees than the Flexographic printing presses manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2020 3.1 2.0 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.9 0.0 2 0 0
2017 1.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333244 · MN · Brooklyn Park

82 Flexographic printing presses manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 226 employers in Brooklyn Park, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Videojet Technologies, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Courier New Media, a division of LSC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hartnett 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4over, LLC 1275 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bushel Boy - Owatonna 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Radiant Change Construction, LLC. 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weis Builders - Minneapolis 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kelleher Construction, Inc 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0591 - Target Northern Campus 5,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMRG 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Services 1,399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Egan Company 962 FTE
NAT-TCR Benjamin Moore & Company 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Herbalife HIMWS 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Eau Claire- 35 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Cutting Edge Steel, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lynchburg Campus 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Christian Community Homes of Osceola 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwest Building Supply 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Escalante Generating Station 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.