Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · New Mexico

Escalante Generating Station

Prewitt, NM · ~90 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Escalante Generating Station runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade D.

Escalante Generating Station: 2.0 TCR = 169% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Escalante Generating Station safety composite

Escalante Generating Station scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2021

Escalante Generating Station injury rate improved

Escalante Generating Station's TCR fell 2.8 from 2.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Prewitt, NM ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.0 · 169% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO Wolfskill Energy Cen…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wolfskill Energy Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Mexico employers → · Look up another →

Escalante Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Escalante Generating Station averages 2.0 TCR (169% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Escalante Generating Station TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Escalante Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Mexico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Electric power generation, fos employers in New Mexico.

Escalante Generating Station (90 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Escalante Generating Station
Escalante Generating Station (90 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Escalante Generating Station has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.9 1.0 5 0 0
2018 3.6 1.8 4 0 0
2017 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2016 2.8 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · NM · Prewitt

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,241 rated employers in New Mexico with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wolfskill Energy Center 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Castle Power Plant 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 300A 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Miller Steam Plant 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE BANTA Oilfield Services, Inc. 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beaty Masonry 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 5675 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE HiBox Logistics LLC 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR McKinley Paper 137 FTE
NAT-TCR Mutual Distributing Company - Asheville 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Demaree Crossing Assisted Living 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Moly Manufacturing LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lorain County Campus 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northwest Building Supply 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reading Fulfillment Center 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indmar Products 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Christian Community Homes of Osceola 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.