Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing · Tennessee

Engineered Materials : Livingston

Livingston, TN · ~256 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Engineered Materials : Livingston runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Engineered Materials : Livingston: 1.1 TCR = 33% of Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Engineered Materials : Livingston safety composite

Engineered Materials : Livingston scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Engineered Materials : Livingston held a steady TCR band

Engineered Materials : Livingston's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.2 in 2018 to 1.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.2 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339991 · Livingston, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO Garlock Sealing Tech…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~256 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Engineered Materials : Livingston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Engineered Materials : Livingston averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Engineered Materials : Livingston TCR series: 2018=1.2 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Engineered Materials : Livingston falls in its industry

218 Gasket, Packing, and Sealing D establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Gasket, Packing, and Sealing D employers in Tennessee.

Engineered Materials : Livingston (256 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Engineered Materials : Livingston
Engineered Materials : Livingston (256 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Engineered Materials : Livingston has more employees than the Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.3 1.3 3 0 0
2022 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2021 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2020 1.2 0.4 3 0 0
2019 1.4 0.7 4 0 0
2018 1.2 0.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339991 · TN · Livingston

218 Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 25 employers in Livingston, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parker Houston TX 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lydall Performance Materials - Beaver Falls Operation 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AESSEAL 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nyrstar Clarksville, Inc. 256 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHATTANOOGA PACKERS 256 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMC Steel Tennessee 256 FTE
STATE-SIZE 879 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livingston Regional Hospital 296 FTE
CITY-NEAR S0358 LIVINGSTON REG. HOSP 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parker Livingston TN 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hutchinson FMS Plant 1 229 FTE
NAT-TCR Reagent Chemical - Geismar 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Stand 8 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Filtration : Lancaster IGFG 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland Office 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. Luke's McCall, Ltd. 256 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kitchen Kettle Village 256 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kabobs 256 FTE
NAT-SIZE JEOL USA Inc. 256 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.