Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing · Texas

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC

Houston, TX · ~48 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC: 1.1 TCR = 34% of Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC safety composite

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC: 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.31× in 2024

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2019 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339991 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 34% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #11/29
  • PHOTO Engineered Materials…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Engineered Materials : Livingston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC averages 1.1 TCR (34% of the Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC falls in its industry

218 Gasket, packing, and sealing d establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 29 Gasket, packing, and sealing d employers in Texas.

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (48 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC
Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (48 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC has fewer employees than the Gasket, packing, and sealing devices man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2022 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339991 · TX · Houston

218 Gasket, packing, and sealing devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Engineered Materials : Livingston 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parker Houston TX 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lydall Performance Materials - Beaver Falls Operation 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lundell Manufacturing Corporation 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE SAN ANTONIO SOD FARM 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUPPORT SERVICES 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE WRANGLER FEED YARD 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kempenaar Dairy LLC 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR 11 - Strongsville 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Nebraska Medicine Patient Svcs 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 213 - Spartanburg 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC - 444 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Mary Washington Eagles Nest 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE 445 - Tucson 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE 455 - Milwaukee Fas 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE AFL Bristol 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.