Thermoplastic resins and plastics materials manufacturing · North Carolina

Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus

Thomasville, NC · ~224 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Thermoplastic resins and plastics materials manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus: 5.1 TCR = 156% of Thermoplastic resins and plastics materials manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus safety composite

Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus: 3.1 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 6.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2021

Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus's TCR rose 2.7 from 3.1 in 2019 to 5.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325211 · Thomasville, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 156% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #36/39
  • PHOTO CPP Global
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~224 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CPP Global (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus averages 5.1 TCR (156% of the Thermoplastic resins and plastics materials manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus TCR series: 2019=3.1 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=5.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus falls in its industry

644 Thermoplastic resins and plast establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 39 Thermoplastic resins and plast employers in North Carolina.

Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus (224 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus
Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus (224 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus has more employees than the Thermoplastic resins and plastics materi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.8 3.9 10 2 0
2020 6.6 5.6 13 1 0
2019 3.1 3.1 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325211 · NC · Thomasville

644 Thermoplastic resins and plastics materials manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 142 employers in Thomasville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CPP Global 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 111-115 Thomasville 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reichhold Pensacola 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acrotech Inc. 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Polymer Group, INC 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berry Global Films - Matthews, NC 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charlotte Steel Mill 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6921-00306 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR MRT-ODFL 1,091 FTE
CITY-NEAR CPT-ODFL 908 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Thomasville Medical Center 725 FTE
CITY-NEAR ATL-ODFL 600 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 0273 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ottawa Reporting Center 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Home Terminal 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR BPW 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 051-Chipley Facility 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parsippany Distribution Center 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roche Bros. Supermarkets - DTX 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Sharp Grossmont Hospital -Hskp 224 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.