Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating · Minnesota

Acrotech Inc.

Lake City, MN · ~30 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Acrotech Inc. runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating workplace, earning a grade D.

Acrotech Inc.: 5.2 TCR = 156% of Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Acrotech Inc. safety composite

Acrotech Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2017→2024

Acrotech Inc. injury rate improved

Acrotech Inc.'s TCR fell 1.3 from 4.7 in 2017 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.7 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=4.0 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=10.8 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325211 · Lake City, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 156% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/15
  • PHOTO Fountain People, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fountain People, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Acrotech Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Acrotech Inc. averages 5.2 TCR (156% of the Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Acrotech Inc. TCR series: 2017=4.7 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=4 · 2021=4 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=10.8 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Acrotech Inc. falls in its industry

644 Plastics and synthetic resins establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 15 Plastics and synthetic resins employers in Minnesota.

Acrotech Inc. (30 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Acrotech Inc.
Acrotech Inc. (30 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Acrotech Inc. has fewer employees than the Plastics and synthetic resins regenerati median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 10.8 3.6 3 0 0
2022 7.5 3.7 1 1 0
2021 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2017 4.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325211 · MN · Lake City

644 Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 20 employers in Lake City, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fountain People, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CPP Global 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 111-115 Thomasville 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ennis-Flint Thomasville 111-115 Campus 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nelson Nursery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Westland Dairy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pipestone Grow Finish 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hearth & Home Technologies 576 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake City Plant 445 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake City 240 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Lake City 187 FTE
NAT-TCR Graetz Mfg Inc 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Formtek Inc 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SpringHill Suites by Marriott Seattle Issaquah 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bradley Stone Industries 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE BBL Management, LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milledgeville Admin Unit 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Augusta 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #170 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.