Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) · California

Ennis, Inc dba Wright Business Graphics

Chino, CA · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ennis, Inc dba Wright Business Graphics runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) workplace, earning a grade D.

Ennis, Inc dba Wright Business Graphics: 4.3 TCR = 130% of Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ennis, Inc dba Wright Business Graphics safety composite

Ennis, Inc dba Wright Business Graphics scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ennis, Inc dba Wright Business Graphics: 2.7 → 5.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 5.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.68× in 2022

Ennis, Inc dba Wright Business Graphics's TCR rose 3.1 from 2.7 in 2021 to 5.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Chino, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 130% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #93/150
  • PHOTO Dion Label Printing,…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dion Label Printing, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Ennis, Inc dba Wright Business Graphics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ennis, Inc dba Wright Business Graphics averages 4.3 TCR (130% of the Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ennis, Inc dba Wright Business Graphics TCR series: 2021=2.7 · 2022=5.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Ennis, Inc dba Wright Business Graphics falls in its industry

2,001 Offset printing (except books, establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #93 safest of 150 Offset printing (except books, employers in California.

Ennis, Inc dba Wright Business Graphics (38 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Ennis, Inc dba Wright Business Graphics
Ennis, Inc dba Wright Business Graphics (38 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Ennis, Inc dba Wright Business Graphics has fewer employees than the Offset printing (except books, printing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.9 2.9 2 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · CA · Chino

2,001 Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 268 employers in Chino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dion Label Printing, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LA O'Neil Data Solutions, LLC 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR O-LAKELAND PRINTING US223 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bovie Screen Process Printing Co Inc. 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O SHIPPING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAR & S Farm Labor Services, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Almonds of California, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bays Ranch Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4078 2,902 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8103 2,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4078 1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Institution for Men 1,680 FTE
NAT-TCR Giant 771 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sevier County Farmers Coop 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hoganas Environment Solutions - Cary, NC 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Wegmans Great Northern 035 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Evergreens of Moorhead 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Woods of Benton 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tamu Starbuck Evans 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE TAMU CFA Undergrd 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.