Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet), laminated plastics, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations

Washington, PA · ~177 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet), laminated plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations: 3.6 TCR = 110% of Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet), laminated plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations safety composite

Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2023→2024

Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations injury rate improved

Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations's TCR fell 1.1 from 4.2 in 2023 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=4.2 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326130 · Washington, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 110% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #9/25
  • PHOTO EJ Muskegon Composites
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~177 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EJ Muskegon Composites (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations averages 3.6 TCR (110% of the Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet), laminated plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations TCR series: 2023=4.2 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations falls in its industry

160 Profile shapes (e.g., plate, r establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 25 Profile shapes (e.g., plate, r employers in Pennsylvania.

Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations (177 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations
Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations (177 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations has more employees than the Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 2.5 5 0 0
2023 4.2 3.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326130 · PA · Washington

160 Profile shapes (e.g., plate, rod, sheet), laminated plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 139 employers in Washington, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EJ Muskegon Composites 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Impact Guard LLC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1001 Sullivan 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signode-Florence 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE CLEVELAND CLIFFS MONESSEN 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smooth-On Inc 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4016-10234000 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3051 LOWE S OF MCCANDLESS PA 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Washington Hospital 1,630 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Meadows Racetrack and Casino 1,245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hollywood Casino at The Meadows 802 FTE
CITY-NEAR Songer Services Incorporated 621 FTE
NAT-TCR Axis Engineering 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant 363 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Professional Sunshine Roofing, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Coca-Cola Bottling of Winona 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Giant 2318 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt (Lewisburg Corrugating), LLC 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Special Products & Mfg, inc. 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1248 Yonkers 177 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.