Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Pennsylvania

Golden Hill Nursing and Rehab

New Castle, PA · ~177 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Golden Hill Nursing and Rehab runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade F.

Golden Hill Nursing and Rehab: 14.5 TCR = 223% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Golden Hill Nursing and Rehab safety composite

Golden Hill Nursing and Rehab scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Golden Hill Nursing and Rehab: 2.7 → 14.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 49.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.95× in 2022

Golden Hill Nursing and Rehab's TCR rose 11.9 from 2.7 in 2016 to 14.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 49.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · New Castle, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.5 · 223% of ind

  • DART 13.8 DART
  • RANK #659/754
  • PHOTO Downs Care and Rehab…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 77 inj
  • SIZE ~177 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Downs Care and Rehabilitation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Golden Hill Nursing and Rehab in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Golden Hill Nursing and Rehab averages 14.5 TCR (223% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Golden Hill Nursing and Rehab TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=12.6 · 2020=49.3 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=14.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Golden Hill Nursing and Rehab falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #659 safest of 754 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Pennsylvania.

Golden Hill Nursing and Rehab (177 employees, TCR 14.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Golden Hill Nursing and Rehab
Golden Hill Nursing and Rehab (177 employees, TCR 14.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Golden Hill Nursing and Rehab has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 14.6 13.8 12 6 0
2021 7.4 5.0 2 4 0
2020 49.3 45.6 12 42 0
2019 12.6 7.6 20 0 0
2018 0.5 0.4 21 0 0
2016 2.7 2.2 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · New Castle

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 91 employers in New Castle, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Downs Care and Rehabilitation 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chisholm Health Center 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR River City Center 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carington Park 14.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE CLEVELAND CLIFFS MONESSEN 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smooth-On Inc 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ensinger, Inc - Washington Operations 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4016-10234000 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Jameson 941 FTE
CITY-NEAR DON 805 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Castle 534 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2287 399 FTE
NAT-TCR Hawks Ridge Assisted Living 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR ISD 991- ELC Montevideo 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Boise Store - 11 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-00994 14.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2073-SW-20730030-MX 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE 547649-Seattle Priority Mail Anx 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mackenzie-Childs - Aurora 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4322 Fort Worth Container 177 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.