Flight simulation machinery manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Environmental Tectonics Corporation

Southampton, PA · ~129 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Environmental Tectonics Corporation runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Flight simulation machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Environmental Tectonics Corporation: 1.8 TCR = 55% of Flight simulation machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Environmental Tectonics Corporation safety composite

Environmental Tectonics Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Environmental Tectonics Corporation: 0.0 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.84× in 2024

Environmental Tectonics Corporation's TCR rose 1.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333318 · Southampton, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 55% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #9/21
  • PHOTO EDI
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EDI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Environmental Tectonics Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Environmental Tectonics Corporation averages 1.8 TCR (55% of the Flight simulation machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Environmental Tectonics Corporation TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Environmental Tectonics Corporation falls in its industry

361 Flight simulation machinery ma establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 21 Flight simulation machinery ma employers in Pennsylvania.

Environmental Tectonics Corporation (129 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Environmental Tectonics Corporation
Environmental Tectonics Corporation (129 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Environmental Tectonics Corporation has more employees than the Flight simulation machinery manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 4.3 4.3 5 0 0
2021 1.8 0.9 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.2 1.3 4 1 0
2018 2.6 2.0 4 0 0
2017 1.9 0.0 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333318 · PA · Southampton

361 Flight simulation machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 31 employers in Southampton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EDI 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lavatec Laundry Technology Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belanger Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oklahoma City 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pennsy Transportation 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robert Ganter Contractors Inc 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lugaila Mechanical Inc. 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frey Lutz LLC 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Southampton Estates 313 FTE
CITY-NEAR NewAge Industries Inc - Southampton 261 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Southampton Estates 191 FTE
CITY-NEAR Superpac Incorporated 179 FTE
NAT-TCR 230026 - Miller Lane Store 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Plaskolite Sheffield, LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Endeavors Unlimited 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR AC Cleveland Beachwood 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hawkinsville 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boston Plant 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSD Partners, LLC 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orchard Hill Operator LLC 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.