Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins · Alabama

Eovations, LLC

Selma, AL · ~102 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eovations, LLC runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins workplace, earning a grade D.

Eovations, LLC: 4.3 TCR = 130% of Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eovations, LLC safety composite

Eovations, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2022

Eovations, LLC injury rate improved

Eovations, LLC's TCR fell 2.7 from 6.5 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.5 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325991 · Selma, AL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 130% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #8/13
  • PHOTO Primex Plastics Colo…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Primex Plastics Color & Compounding Jasper (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Eovations, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eovations, LLC averages 4.3 TCR (130% of the Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eovations, LLC TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=3.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Eovations, LLC falls in its industry

342 Custom compounding (i.e., blen establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 13 Custom compounding (i.e., blen employers in Alabama.

Eovations, LLC (102 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Eovations, LLC
Eovations, LLC (102 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Eovations, LLC has more employees than the Custom compounding (i.e., blending and m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.8 0.6 6 0 0
2021 6.4 6.4 9 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 2 0 0
2019 3.6 2.4 3 0 0
2018 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2017 6.3 4.2 6 0 0
2016 6.5 2.6 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325991 · AL · Selma

342 Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 48 employers in Selma, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Primex Plastics Color & Compounding Jasper 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sika Corporation 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ravago Manufacturing Americas Manchester 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avient North Baltimore 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE White-Spunner Construction LLC 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.T. Harrison Construction Co., Inc. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Proshot Concrete, Inc 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE MVP Tuscumbia 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Paper - Riverdale Mill 779 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vaughan Regional Medical Center 473 FTE
CITY-NEAR S0492 VAUGHAN REGIONAL MED CTR 352 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bush Hog Selma 338 FTE
NAT-TCR Food City Store #217 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1153 - Vincennes 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1435 - Lawton 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR HG808 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 990 Savnannah DC 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food City Store #614 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food City Store #706 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Food City Store #897 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.