Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing · Connecticut

Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation

Enfield, CT · ~442 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation: 2.6 TCR = 78% of Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation safety composite

Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2024

Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation injury rate improved

Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation's TCR fell 1.9 from 3.5 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.5 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334516 · Enfield, CT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 78% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK P21
  • PHOTO Siskiyou Corporation
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 87 inj
  • SIZE ~442 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Siskiyou Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation averages 2.6 TCR (78% of the Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation TCR series: 2016=3.5 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation falls in its industry

213 Laboratory analytical instrume establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation (442 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation
Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation (442 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Eppendorf Manufacturing Corporation has more employees than the Laboratory analytical instruments (excep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.4 8 0 0
2023 1.7 1.1 9 0 0
2022 1.1 0.2 6 0 0
2021 1.6 0.9 7 0 0
2020 3.3 3.0 12 0 0
2019 1.4 1.2 5 0 0
2018 4.5 3.9 14 1 0
2017 4.3 2.8 14 0 0
2016 3.5 3.0 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334516 · CT · Enfield

213 Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 106 employers in Enfield, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Siskiyou Corporation 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teledyne Instruments 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Monitors 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teledyne PI - Trenton 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cheshire Corectional Institution 440 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connecticut Spring and Stamping 439 FTE
STATE-SIZE BELIMO Aircontrols (USA), Inc. 445 FTE
STATE-SIZE Becton Dickinson - Canaan 445 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC 41 - Hartford 464 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance Auto Parts DC 41 419 FTE
CITY-NEAR 12131 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carl Robinson Correctional Institution 330 FTE
NAT-TCR Texas Concrete Partners (Victoria) 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Billings Clinic Heights 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Roricks 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Barbe America, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE ROKI AMERICA Co., Ltd. 442 FTE
NAT-SIZE Memorial Hermann Cypress Hospital 442 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shrewsbury Service Center 442 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lennar Tampa 442 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.