Air flow controllers (except valves), air-conditioning and refrigeration, manufacturing · Connecticut

BELIMO Aircontrols (USA), Inc.

Danbury, CT · ~445 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BELIMO Aircontrols (USA), Inc. runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Air flow controllers (except valves), air-conditioning and refrigeration, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

BELIMO Aircontrols (USA), Inc.: 3.2 TCR = 96% of Air flow controllers (except valves), air-conditioning and refrigeration, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BELIMO Aircontrols (USA), Inc. safety composite

BELIMO Aircontrols (USA), Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2019→2024

BELIMO Aircontrols (USA), Inc. injury rate improved

BELIMO Aircontrols (USA), Inc.'s TCR fell 1.2 from 4.2 in 2019 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.2 · 2020=2.9 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334512 · Danbury, CT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 96% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK P32
  • PHOTO Design Ready Control…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 68 inj
  • SIZE ~445 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Design Ready Controls - BP8 (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

BELIMO Aircontrols (USA), Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BELIMO Aircontrols (USA), Inc. averages 3.2 TCR (96% of the Air flow controllers (except valves), air-conditioning and refrigeration, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BELIMO Aircontrols (USA), Inc. TCR series: 2019=4.2 · 2020=2.9 · 2022=2 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.3

Where BELIMO Aircontrols (USA), Inc. falls in its industry

50 Air flow controllers (except v establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
BELIMO Aircontrols (USA), Inc. (445 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate BELIMO Aircontrols (USA), Inc.
BELIMO Aircontrols (USA), Inc. (445 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 2.3

BELIMO Aircontrols (USA), Inc. has more employees than the Air flow controllers (except valves), ai median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 2.2 15 0 0
2023 3.8 3.2 16 3 0
2022 2.0 1.6 9 0 0
2020 2.9 1.8 11 0 0
2019 4.2 2.7 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334512 · CT · Danbury

50 Air flow controllers (except valves), air-conditioning and refrigeration, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 171 employers in Danbury, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Design Ready Controls - BP8 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NIS, LLC Davenport 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Speed Equipment Inc 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HAYWARD - Rhode Island 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Becton Dickinson - Canaan 445 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jacobs Vehicle Systems 446 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of New Haven - City Hall 446 FTE
STATE-SIZE MPTN Gov't 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR DANBURY HOSPITAL INC. 2,822 FTE
CITY-NEAR Board of Education 2,209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western CT Medical Group 1,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Connecticut Medical Group 1,239 FTE
NAT-TCR Refractron Technologies Corporation 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 2296 - Williamsburg East 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR H2O Solutions, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR S. Medford Burger King 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wad Productions, Inc. 445 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5 Carlisle Road 445 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koch Filter 445 FTE
NAT-SIZE C.D. Smith Home Office 445 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.