Aerial work platforms manufacturing · Oklahoma

Equipment Technology, LLC.

Oklahoma City, OK · ~265 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Equipment Technology, LLC. runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aerial work platforms manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Equipment Technology, LLC.: 4.3 TCR = 130% of Aerial work platforms manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Equipment Technology, LLC. safety composite

Equipment Technology, LLC. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.5

2016→2024

Equipment Technology, LLC. injury rate improved

Equipment Technology, LLC.'s TCR fell 15.5 from 16.0 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 16.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.0 · 2017=7.6 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333923 · Oklahoma City, OK ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 130% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Watertown Distributi…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 79 inj
  • SIZE ~265 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Watertown Distribution Center DC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Equipment Technology, LLC. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Equipment Technology, LLC. averages 4.3 TCR (130% of the Aerial work platforms manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Equipment Technology, LLC. TCR series: 2016=16 · 2017=7.6 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Equipment Technology, LLC. falls in its industry

157 Aerial work platforms manufact establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Aerial work platforms manufact employers in Oklahoma.

Equipment Technology, LLC. (265 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Equipment Technology, LLC.
Equipment Technology, LLC. (265 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Equipment Technology, LLC. has more employees than the Aerial work platforms manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2023 1.6 1.2 4 0 0
2022 1.1 0.0 3 0 0
2021 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2020 2.4 0.4 6 0 0
2017 7.6 3.4 26 1 0
2016 16.0 9.0 37 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333923 · OK · Oklahoma City

157 Aerial work platforms manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,293 employers in Oklahoma City, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Watertown Distribution Center DC 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR JLG - Weber 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Fe Springs 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Terex - Watertown 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cytovance Biologics 265 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henniges Automotive Oklahoma Inc 265 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crosby- Mckissick 265 FTE
STATE-SIZE 374 265 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : OKC1 3,710 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - OKC1 3,462 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony Hospital 3,417 FTE
CITY-NEAR OK005 3,027 FTE
NAT-TCR Schmelz Countryside Volkswagen 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR OH101 Strongsville WH 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Runnings of Sioux Falls 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Modineer Plant 10 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE JC Farm Services, Inc. 265 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clark Distributing Co., Inc. 265 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2036 - Atlanta Perimeter 265 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2006 - Staten Island 265 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.