Overhead Traveling Cranes Manufacturing · Wisconsin

Watertown Distribution Center DC

Watertown, WI · ~37 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Watertown Distribution Center DC runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Overhead Traveling Cranes Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Watertown Distribution Center DC: 4.3 TCR = 130% of Overhead Traveling Cranes Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Watertown Distribution Center DC safety composite

Watertown Distribution Center DC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2018→2024

Watertown Distribution Center DC injury rate improved

Watertown Distribution Center DC's TCR fell 2.3 from 4.8 in 2018 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.8 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=7.9 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333923 · Watertown, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 130% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/14
  • PHOTO Equipment Technology…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Equipment Technology, LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Watertown Distribution Center DC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Watertown Distribution Center DC averages 4.3 TCR (130% of the Overhead Traveling Cranes Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Watertown Distribution Center DC TCR series: 2018=4.8 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=7.9 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Watertown Distribution Center DC falls in its industry

157 Overhead Traveling Cranes Manu establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 14 Overhead Traveling Cranes Manu employers in Wisconsin.

Watertown Distribution Center DC (37 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Watertown Distribution Center DC
Watertown Distribution Center DC (37 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Watertown Distribution Center DC has fewer employees than the Overhead Traveling Cranes Manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2023 7.9 5.3 3 0 0
2022 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2021 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2020 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2019 6.5 4.3 3 0 0
2018 4.8 2.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333923 · WI · Watertown

157 Overhead Traveling Cranes Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 59 employers in Watertown, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Equipment Technology, LLC. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR JLG - Weber 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Fe Springs 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Terex - Watertown 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Habelman Bros. Company 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lamers Dairy, Inc 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wissota Hydro Plant 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stevens Point 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Watertown Regional Medical Center 733 FTE
CITY-NEAR S0469 WATERTOWN REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR 602 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1776 309 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1776 296 FTE
NAT-TCR EPIC 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Northwood University 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Landmark Nursing and Rehab 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt (Quality Carton), LLC 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn Kansas City 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE TXS012 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Santa Maria Plastering & Drywall, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE HS Express Toledo, OH 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.