Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers · California

ERI Fresno, Suite 105

Fresno, CA · ~48 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ERI Fresno, Suite 105 runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

ERI Fresno, Suite 105: 3.7 TCR = 169% of Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ERI Fresno, Suite 105 safety composite

ERI Fresno, Suite 105 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ERI Fresno, Suite 105: 0.0 → 8.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 9.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.45× in 2024

ERI Fresno, Suite 105's TCR rose 8.1 from 0.0 in 2018 to 8.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Fresno, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.7 · 169% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #48/91
  • PHOTO Phoenix McDowell
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Phoenix McDowell (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

ERI Fresno, Suite 105 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ERI Fresno, Suite 105 averages 3.7 TCR (169% of the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ERI Fresno, Suite 105 TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=9.7 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=8.1 · BLS 2.2

Where ERI Fresno, Suite 105 falls in its industry

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 91 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl employers in California.

ERI Fresno, Suite 105 (48 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate ERI Fresno, Suite 105
ERI Fresno, Suite 105 (48 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

ERI Fresno, Suite 105 has more employees than the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.1 5.4 3 0 0
2023 8.1 5.4 3 0 0
2022 9.7 7.3 4 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · CA · Fresno

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Phoenix McDowell 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PADNOS Plastics Solutions 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berman Bros Inc 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windy City Iron and Metal LLC 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE ARVIN PRODUCTION & ADMIN 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rava Business Park 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Guerrero Transportation & Contracting Inc 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE VPS, Inc 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR Premium Peanut 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Jackie O's Pub & Brewery - 2 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlas-SSI, Inc - Slaughter 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Harnden Group 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Livingston Pipe & Tube, Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale North Austin 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE McDonough Toyota 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Human Services, Inc. 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.