Power transformers, electric, manufacturing · Tennessee

Ermco Components, Inc.

Dyersburg, TN · ~2,113 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ermco Components, Inc. runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Power transformers, electric, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Ermco Components, Inc.: 1.9 TCR = 59% of Power transformers, electric, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ermco Components, Inc. safety composite

Ermco Components, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2022→2024

Ermco Components, Inc. injury rate improved

Ermco Components, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.4 from 2.1 in 2022 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.1 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335311 · Dyersburg, TN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 59% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #8/13
  • PHOTO Koontz-Wagner Custom…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 117 inj
  • SIZE ~2,113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Koontz-Wagner Custom Controls (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Ermco Components, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ermco Components, Inc. averages 1.9 TCR (59% of the Power transformers, electric, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ermco Components, Inc. TCR series: 2022=2.1 · 2023=2 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Ermco Components, Inc. falls in its industry

141 Power transformers, electric, establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 13 Power transformers, electric, employers in Tennessee.

Ermco Components, Inc. (2,113 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Ermco Components, Inc.
Ermco Components, Inc. (2,113 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Ermco Components, Inc. has more employees than the Power transformers, electric, manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.1 35 0 0
2023 2.0 1.1 43 0 0
2022 2.1 1.2 39 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335311 · TN · Dyersburg

141 Power transformers, electric, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 64 employers in Dyersburg, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Koontz-Wagner Custom Controls 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bland - 171 Industry Drive 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Construction Electrical Products 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nova Magnetics, Inc 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE TNNAS24 ASCENSION SAINT THOMAS MIDTOWN HOSP 2,102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton County Government 2,100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Johnson City Medical Center 2,099 FTE
STATE-SIZE TNOAK - OAKHAVEN PACKAGE DISTRIBUTION CENTER 2,081 FTE
CITY-NEAR ERMCO 1,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR NSK Steering Systems 569 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Tennessee Healthcare Dyersburg Hospital 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tennova Healthcare Dyersburg Regional 392 FTE
NAT-TCR WI114 Green Bay Broadway 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Home Chef - Bedford Park 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sienna Shipyards 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Coldwater Sintered Metal Products, Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Swift Pork Company Worthington 2,113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chevron North America Exploration and Production Company Gulf of Mexico 2,113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Research and Development Sullivan Park 2,114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sterling Stamping Plant 2,115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.