Manufacturing Facility - Stamping · Michigan

Sterling Stamping Plant

Sterling Heights, MI · ~2,115 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sterling Stamping Plant runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Manufacturing Facility - Stamping workplace, earning a grade B.

Sterling Stamping Plant: 3.0 TCR = 55% of Manufacturing Facility - Stamping BLS 5.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sterling Stamping Plant safety composite

Sterling Stamping Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2024

Sterling Stamping Plant injury rate improved

Sterling Stamping Plant's TCR fell 1.8 from 4.3 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.3 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=2.6 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Sterling Heights, MI AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 55% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #35/165
  • PHOTO Futaba Industrial Te…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 345 inj
  • SIZE ~2,115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Futaba Industrial Texas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Sterling Stamping Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sterling Stamping Plant averages 3.0 TCR (55% of the Manufacturing Facility - Stamping BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sterling Stamping Plant TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=2.6 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 5.4

Where Sterling Stamping Plant falls in its industry

510 Manufacturing Facility - Stamp establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 165 Manufacturing Facility - Stamp employers in Michigan.

Sterling Stamping Plant (2,115 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Sterling Stamping Plant
Sterling Stamping Plant (2,115 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Sterling Stamping Plant has more employees than the Manufacturing Facility - Stamping median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 1.1 32 6 0
2023 2.1 1.3 33 2 0
2022 2.7 1.4 34 11 0
2019 2.6 1.3 43 20 0
2018 3.1 1.4 66 13 0
2017 3.2 1.5 59 15 0
2016 4.3 2.0 78 28 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · MI · Sterling Heights

510 Manufacturing Facility - Stamping employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 195 employers in Sterling Heights, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Futaba Industrial Texas 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri-Con Industries Ltd, Stamping Plant 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR US Adient, LLC Clanton 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kirchhoff Automotive Lansing 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE MIGRA1 ASCENSION GENESYS HOSPITAL 2,125 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1855-MIKAL1 2,103 FTE
STATE-SIZE MIDET210 ASCENSION PROVIDENCE HOSP - SOUTHFIELD 2,128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Detroit Engine 2,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Heights Assembly Plant 5,783 FTE
CITY-NEAR STERLING PLNT 2,319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conti, LLC 1,892 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Heights Complex 1,716 FTE
NAT-TCR ReSteel Supply Co., Inc. New England 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bowlin's The Thing Travel Centers 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Transportation : Holcombe Houston - Trans 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lloyd Roofing 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Toyota Motor Mfg West Virginia, Inc 2,115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harry and David Operations Inc 2,116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - FTW1 2,116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mobile Infirmary 2,116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.