Industrial supplies, disposable plastics, paper, merchant wholesalers · Arizona

Ernest Packaging Solutions Arizona

Avondale, AZ · ~33 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ernest Packaging Solutions Arizona runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Industrial supplies, disposable plastics, paper, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Ernest Packaging Solutions Arizona: 2.6 TCR = 120% of Industrial supplies, disposable plastics, paper, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ernest Packaging Solutions Arizona safety composite

Ernest Packaging Solutions Arizona scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2021→2023

Ernest Packaging Solutions Arizona injury rate improved

Ernest Packaging Solutions Arizona's TCR fell 4.6 from 4.6 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.6 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424130 · Avondale, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 120% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO Forman, Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Forman, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Ernest Packaging Solutions Arizona in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ernest Packaging Solutions Arizona averages 2.6 TCR (120% of the Industrial supplies, disposable plastics, paper, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ernest Packaging Solutions Arizona TCR series: 2021=4.6 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Ernest Packaging Solutions Arizona falls in its industry

290 Industrial supplies, disposabl establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Industrial supplies, disposabl employers in Arizona.

Ernest Packaging Solutions Arizona (33 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ernest Packaging Solutions Arizona
Ernest Packaging Solutions Arizona (33 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Ernest Packaging Solutions Arizona has fewer employees than the Industrial supplies, disposable plastics median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424130 · AZ · Avondale

290 Industrial supplies, disposable plastics, paper, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 78 employers in Avondale, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Forman, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Container Company 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR RJ Schinner Branch 8 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bunzl Distribution Midatlantic, LLC (DBA Bunzl Richmond) 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Turf Office 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danzeisen Dairy, LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARLINGTON SOUTH 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE TB CONTRACTORS INC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-501 914 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2554 371 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2554 370 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0691 - AVONDALE AZ WHSE 351 FTE
NAT-TCR Bio-Rad Laboratories - Irvine 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sherwood Nursing & Rehab-CAN 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR UMBC Campus* 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rider Daly's 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE organic berries 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Davidson Brothers Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inotech Laser Processing Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE HDN Hayden Steamboat- Yampa Valley Airport 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.